Re: -O vs -O2, revisited

On Wed, May 09, 2001, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> If you look you will find the magic (which is no magic at all when you
> see it). Search for 2.95.

Hrm. The code disables -O completely. I've not had a problem with
-O under gcc .. is there a reason why the magic completely
disables optimisation?

ADrian

>
> --
> Henrik
>
>
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > > What Squid have is rules to in configure.in to forcibly bump it down on
> > > known broken configurations such as.
> > >
> > > * Solaris X86
> > > * GCC 2.95.[12]
> > > * Motorola 88k
> > >
> > > Now it seems we need to extend that list somewhat with
> > > GCC 2.95.3
> > > GCC 2.96
> >
> > Right. Do you want to do the magic?
> > I still am not really sure of configure.in magic.
> >
> > Adrian
> >
> > --
> > Adrian Chadd "How could we possibly use sex to get
> > <adrian@creative.net.au> what we want?
> > Sex _IS_ what we want!" -- Fraser

-- 
Adrian Chadd			"How could we possibly use sex to get
<adrian@creative.net.au>	  what we want?
			 	   Sex _IS_ what we want!" -- Fraser