Re: -O vs -O2, revisited

----- Original Message -----
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@hem.passagen.se>
To: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@creative.net.au>
Cc: <squid-dev@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 3:12 AM
Subject: Re: -O vs -O2, revisited

> Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > And no, its not a freebsdism, its a
gcc-under-a-non-linux-i386-platform
> > ism. :(
>
> Hmm.. so you are saying that the same bug does not exists if the exact
> same GCC version is running on Linux? Odd.. I imagined the code
> generation was mostly the same across the OS:es running on the same
> CPU..

IIRC redhat 7.0 is the same. A whole bunch of distro's seem to have
forgotten that pre-release means "before" release :]

> Have someone contacted the FreeBSD/OpenBSD maintainers to get the
> compiler fixed?

I haven't per se, but I do recall posting a "recompile with -O " to the
openBSD misc list.

> Which versions does these broken GCC compilers report themselves as?

openBSD 2.8 is:

Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-unknown-openbsd2.8/2.95.3/specs
gcc version 2.95.3 19991030 (prerelease)

Eob
>
> --
> Henrik
>
Received on Sat May 05 2001 - 21:31:18 MDT