Re: CygWin Windows Service support released

Robert Collins wrote:
>
> Also (I think it was) Duane didn't want new actions added to the
> cachemgr, so reconfiguring from there might not get into HEAD. Of course
> you can get most things into HEAD and keep the patches for your setup
> out of HEAD.

True. Active actions in the cachemgr interface will not get accepted to
HEAD.

Active actions using some other local communication channel on the host
will, and is badly needed as the signal approach cannot easily be
extended with more actions... (signals is a very limited resource)

--
Henrik