On Thu, Apr 19, 2001, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > With all the small bugfixes that have gone into stable1, perhaps we
> > want to look at tagging stable2 sometime soon.
>
> Sounds reasonable.
>
> Probably also about time for a 2.5.DEVEL1, but maybe we should wait for
> some more stuff..
*nod*
> In the 2.4 queue:
>
> * A re-bugfix (already fixed once) for ranges causing bandwidth
> spikes. Patch in HEAD and bugzilla and confirmed to fix the issue, but I
> am not sure how to update the patches page so it hasn't got committed to
> 2.4 yet..
I've held off keeping the patches uptodate because of the decision
a while back to use bugzillafor the 2.4 patches. The easiest way
to fix this is to createa new bug for the 2.4 patch, put
in the bug description "see parent bug xxx" (I think bugzilla lets you
do this to "chain bug dependencies" ..), submit a patch in there,
and then make sure when you click "Bugzilla entries for 2.4"
on the 2.4 page it pops up.
> * The improved LDAP authenticator
*nod* this extra functionality is also a pusher for 2.4stable2 .
> In the 2.5 queue:
>
> * chunked mempools
> * The TOS/sourceaddr stuff
> * multiple SSL certificates
> * automake
> [and probably some more stuff.. please shout if you feel forgotten]
I think this covers the active 2.5 projects right now..
I'd definitely like the 1st, third and fourth in 2.5 as soon as they're
reasonable mature .. I'm not entirely sure on the second one asI haven't
looked at the implementation just yet.
adrian
-- Adrian Chadd "Two hundred and thirty-three thousand <adrian@creative.net.au> times the speed of light. Dear holy fucking shit."Received on Thu Apr 19 2001 - 14:45:27 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:47 MST