Re: eventio API

On Sun, Feb 18, 2001, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > I kind of agree but its starting to get a little complicated now.
> > The other issue with the eventio code is that we aren't working with
> > a 1 client -- 1 server setup like the modio branch, we're working
> > with many clients - 1 server setup which could interfere with things.
>
> Not a big deal for eventio. Those problems belongs at the layer above...
> and only deferred reads are a real issue (apart from code munging to fit
> the new API), but even that is not unmanageable, only have to be moved
> one step up..

Yup.

> > Perhaps we want to look at finishing the modio branch to a point
> > where the eventio code will fit in better? Once I abstract the request/reply
> > objects a little further the IO requirements for each will be a lot
> > clearer imho.
>
> Lets do it this way: You work on modio to finish it up, I work on
> eventio, and we try to meet mid-way?

I like that idea. Lets do that. :-)

Adrian

-- 
Adrian Chadd			"Romance novel?"
<adrian@creative.net.au>	 "Girl Porn."
				    - http://www.sinfest.net/d/20010202.html