Hi squid-dev guys,
What do you think of this?
Adrian
----- Forwarded message from "Kurt J. Lidl" <lidl@pix.net> -----
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:03:01 -0500
From: "Kurt J. Lidl" <lidl@pix.net>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc: "Kurt J. Lidl" <lidl@pix.net>
Subject: Re: more article FYIs..
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 12:58:30PM +0100, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> uhm, squid's internal DNS isn't synchronous - it will handle multiple
> parallel requests that are outstanding and cache their responses. If
> the internal DNS routines were synchronous, they wouldn't be a default. :)
Then it is broken. (See below)
> In fact, we don't use the system resolver at all - the internal DNS
> code in squid actually implements creating, sending, recieving, parsing
> and validating DNS packets. This cuts down on context switch and IPC
> overhead.
>
> Squid-2.3 will query the servers in /etc/resolv.conf . Squid-2.4 will
> also parse your /etc/hosts file and permanently cache any entries found
> there. If you are seeing a slowdown with internal DNS configured, you
> may wish to check that the first resolvers in /etc/resolv.conf are
> reachable and return quickly.
It doesn't work properly if the machine has the following in its
/etc/resolv.conf:
domain pix.net
nameserver 0.0.0.0
nameserver 192.111.45.13
nameserver 198.6.1.5
The first entry, is, as I'm sure you know a completely legitimate way
of specifying localhost as the resolving host.
Squid then ignores all the answers coming back from that nameserver,
as they are sourced from one of the IP addresses that BIND has bound
to. If squid sees 0.0.0.0 as the nameserver, it should walk the interface
list and figure out what ip addresses are local and accept answers
from them too.
Without that logic, squid will always send to the first IP address 0.0.0.0,
which responds, squid will ignore the response, and then send to the
second IP address, which after some amount of time, will respond.
> I hope this helps. :)
Me too.
The machine I'm running this on has something like six interfaces that
it can respond from:
lidl@gatekeeper-36: netstat -an | grep "\.53"
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1.53 *.* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 192.111.45.65.53 *.* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 192.111.45.1.53 *.* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 63.113.184.82.53 *.* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 192.111.45.193.53 *.* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 192.111.45.129.53 *.* LISTEN
udp 0 0 *.53 *.*
udp 0 0 127.0.0.1.53 *.*
udp 0 0 192.111.45.65.53 *.*
udp 0 0 192.111.45.1.53 *.*
udp 0 0 63.113.184.82.53 *.*
udp 0 0 192.111.45.193.53 *.*
udp 0 0 192.111.45.129.53 *.*
By switching to the dnsserver program, squid effectively starts believing
the responses from the (very fast) nameserver listening on 0.0.0.0 -- as
the dnsserver program doens't toss out those answers.
If you fix squid, I'll be happy to write an update to my article :-)
(I still think the dnsserver instruementation hack was a good idea, however.)
-Kurt
----- End forwarded message -----
-- Adrian Chadd "Programming is like sex: <adrian@freebsd.org> One mistake and you have to support for a lifetime." -- rec.humor.funnyReceived on Tue Feb 13 2001 - 10:39:50 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:30 MST