On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> I haven't got the time to abuse the code yet... but so far there has
> only been minor changes (several of them repeated at many places).
>
> Has the issues with diskd on Solaris been solved?
>
> If the diskd issue is solved, then STABLE1 without yet another PRE
> release is OK by me.
This is the O_NDELAY/O_NONBLOCK problem.
We need to decide on when to use O_NDELAY versus O_NONBLOCK for Sun
boxes. My recollection is that on SunOS and early solaris, we must
use O_NDELAY.
Received on Fri Feb 09 2001 - 13:57:25 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:28 MST