On Tue, Nov 14, 2000, Robert Collins wrote:
> > I think what you want to do belongs more with the "validation"
> > procedure. Better to start a background task that calls stat at
> > a low rate if necessary, after the swap.state files have been fully
> > read.
>
> I'll look at that. Are there any gotchas I should know about
> locking/removing store items once the swap.state is in memory? Perhaps a
> reference in the code to see the best way of doing it?
>
Hrm. After the validation is completed? You can just storeRelease()
without any worries.
Adrian
-- Adrian Chadd "God: Damn! I left pot everywhere! <adrian@creative.net.au> Now I'll have to create Republicans!" - Bill HicksReceived on Tue Nov 14 2000 - 02:45:56 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:58 MST