Re: SquidNG vs squid.sourceforge

On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 01:51:40AM +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Yury Shevchuk wrote:
>
> > In fact, I don't understand what other developers need at this point.
> > I can merge the squidng reiserfs_raw brinch to squidng HEAD. Or I can
> > move it to reiserfs_raw branch of squid.sourceforge.net. Please
> > advice what is better?
>
> My preference is to have the squidng branches moved to
> squid.sourceforge.net in some time, but due to lack of time I cannot
> help with this until mid december. So my proposal for now is to
>
> a) (optional) Move the CVS repository from the shell server to the real
> CVS server on SourceForge. The SourceForge staff can help with this.
>
> b) Then continue as you have done until mid december.
>
> The main work in the move to the squid.sourceforge repository will
> involve re-splitting squidng into it's various sub-parts to prepare them
> for being merged back into Squid when the time is suitable.

So my feeling is that we should leave everything as is until
mid-december, to avoid unnecessary moves. We will continue working on
squidng reiserfs_raw branch, possibly updating it from squidng HEAD.

Thanks,

-- sizif
Received on Thu Nov 09 2000 - 01:44:32 MST