On 18 Oct 2000, at 5:38, Henrik Nordstrom <hno@hem.passagen.se> wrote:
> > Is this intentional that each FS type has its own private definition
> > of typedef/struct _RebuildState ?
>
> Yes.
>
> > shouldn't these be moved to structs.h and typedefs.h ?
>
> No. The rebuild state may differ with different implementations of the
> filesystem.
>
> Currenly all implementations use the same structure definition because
> all are derivates from the ufs code.
hmm, I see. Then perhaps we should rename the struct with FS prefix?
------------------------------------
Andres Kroonmaa <andre@online.ee>
Delfi Online
Tel: 6501 731, Fax: 6501 708
Pärnu mnt. 158, Tallinn,
11317 Estonia
Received on Wed Oct 18 2000 - 02:04:35 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:50 MST