what about a new -k option?
would Duane be ok with that?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@hem.passagen.se>
To: "Chemolli Francesco (USI)" <ChemolliF@GruppoCredit.it>
Cc: <squid-dev@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: Re-checking disk cache
> Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote:
> >
> > > > Whats wrong with ..
> > > >
> > > > ./client cache_object://localhost/log-rotate
> > >
> > > Only that Duane does not want to have more active operations in
> > > cachemgr..
> >
> > What would you do? Assuming that we might want
> > to extend squid's remote-control capabilities, possibly
> > in a scriptable manner.
>
> I would extend cachemgr, and have done so previously to allow selective
> reload of ACL entries.
>
> If not extending cachemgr then I would create a control channel using a
> named UNIX socket.
>
> /Henrik
>
>
Received on Tue Oct 17 2000 - 17:26:53 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:50 MST