Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote:
> Can't we just expand on the diskd concept?
> Idea: the parent process forks one diskd for each storage, and
> passes shmem IDs to all children. Then accesses are done
> through this helper processes farm.
Look back in the squid-dev archives. Something similar to this has been
proposed before when discussing multithreading, multiprocesses, and
other approaches to getting Squid running in SMP environments.
Note that simply doing a diskd won't suffice as it is nothing more than
simply asyncronous i/o with some minor mapping. Far more has to be
restructured for it to work.
/Henrik
Received on Tue Oct 17 2000 - 08:08:23 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:50 MST