Erik Hofman wrote:
> Ah I see. I always thought open/close would be quite simple and so
> rather speedy.
> Wouldn a LRU filedescriptor cache e an option then?
> Cache openfiles until you run out of filedescriptors (preferably
> earlier) and then close a file to get room for another file. This should
> bring the number of opne/close sessions to a minimum.
Hmm.. how would a filedescriptor cache help you? You sill need to open
the file at some point.. or are you thinking about also having some
other storage model than one file per object?
Yes, the one file per object storage model is not the most effective.
-- Henrik Nordstrom Squid hackerReceived on Wed Jun 21 2000 - 14:20:24 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:30 MST