Duane Wessels wrote:
> My concern is the amount of changes occuring recently. The more beasts
> we kill (commloops, deferred reads, pump, etc) , the longer it will be
> until the next version becomes stable again.
Agreed.
My suggestion is to start a feature freeze of Squid-2.4 soon. But before
that I'd like to commit the policy changes currently in final testing.
Squid-2.4 todo list:
* Policy changes/modularization
* Memory usage optimizations (basically field size adjustments)
* Bug fixes
Suggestions for Squid-2.5:
* commloops and comm_read/write optimizations
* reworked request flow
* clean up the hot object cache
* Kill pump.c
* possibly split the store per cache_dir.
* NTLM authorization
* SSL gatewaying
* Transfer Encoding
* Further memory usage optimizations by seriously considering what needs
to be kept in memory
/Henrik
Received on Sat Jun 03 2000 - 04:21:32 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:28 MST