On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Dancer wrote:
> Ran a ten-minute goal with dhr==0 && rep_cachable==0 &&
> req_rate==120/sec. Steady-state connections in use ~ 400. Success. Left
> the cache and disks as were (16% full, 600MB buffered)
>
> Repeat tests at different rates:
> 160/sec rapid lose.
> 150/sec less rapid lose.
> 140/sec Better, but still a lose.
> 130/sec Stable at ~450 connections
130/sec uncachable is quite low if you expect it to do 120/sec cachable!
> (reference: The client box maxes out around 1900 descriptors)
> (benchmark: Initial tests without squid showed rates of 200/sec were
> stable on this network, on the basic polymix set)
Did you decrease MSL value on client and server machines to, say, 3 sec?
Alex.
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:57 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:06 MST