RE: Status of mail list ...

We are similiarly interested in this. A combined effort would seem better
than a series of independant endevours....

Wayne

At 01:16 AM 3/17/98 , Barry Raveendran Greene wrote:
>Hello Kostas,
>
>Any pointers to the MIB? I would like to start meshing our work with your
>work. There will be product specific areas, but working towards typical
>things every cache will need to support is something we need to get started.
>Otherwise, people are going to drift off in separate directions.
>
>Barry
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kostas Anagnostakis [mailto:kostas@nlanr.net]
>> Sent: Monday, March 16, 1998 11:27 AM
>> To: Scott C. Lemon
>> Cc: Cache SNMP
>> Subject: Re: Status of mail list ...
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Scott,
>>
>> On Sun, 15 Mar 1998, Scott C. Lemon wrote:
>>
>> > I was wondering if I am somehow not properly subscribed to this list ...
>>
>> I was wondering if there was anybody interested in snmp-based cache
>> management at all ;-)
>>
>> >
>> > I have not seen any mail, and I just noticed that the MIB proposal was
>> > updated on the NLANR site late last month ... was any annoucement sent
>> > to the list?
>> >
>> > I just want to stay involved ... I am working in this area currently ...
>> >
>>
>> Emm, it's my fault I didn't send any announcement to the list, actually
>> we are constantly changing the mib and our squid implementation. The
>> current structure is somehow embarassing, there's definitely need for
>> reorganisation & generalisation.
>>
>> FYI, as of beta16, snmp code is quite stable & some (sadly squid specific)
>> interesting information can be retrieved/plotted/whatever. We currently
>> use mrtg and also Advent's java snmp tools.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> -Kostas
>>
>>
>
Received on Mon Mar 16 1998 - 18:21:44 MST